EVOLUÇÃO DA PROXY QUALIDADE PARA MODELOS DE EFICIÊNCIA BASEADOS EM BENCHMARKING

revisão para os serviços de transmissão elétrica brasileira.

Palavras-chave: Serviço Transmissão Operacional Energético, Qualidade em Modelos de Benchmarking, Custos Eficientes, Serviço de Transmissão Elétrica

Resumo

Este estudo realiza apresenta a evolução teórica sobre a proxy de qualidade inserida no setor de transmissão elétrica, a fim de compor a análise de eficiência operacional dos prestadores de serviços. O setor elétrico brasileiro é formado por prestadores de serviços operacionais mediante concessão. Esses operarão e administração o sistema de Transmissão elétrica cumprindo a legislação conforme determinação da agência reguladora. A agencia reguladora brasileira, ANEEL –Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica tem como objetivo fiscalizar os níveis de serviços prestados pelos concessionados. No segundo ciclo tarifário de 2009, na renovação das concessões de 2012, a ANEEL utilizou de métricas distintas e ad hoc ao processo de eficiência para avaliar a eficiência operacional dos operadores do serviço de transmissão. Assim, foi visto que o processo adotado não cumpre com requisitos assumidos pelo órgão regulador. O estudo contribui para a literatura verificando que após 2009, os autores apontam a relevância da incorporação da proxy de qualidade para estudos de eficiência comparada no setor de energia elétrica. Não obstante, também aponta a evolução da proxy de qualidade mensurada por unidades da DEC – Duração das interrupções e da FEC – Frequência das Interrupções para valores financeiros, ou seja, o custo da indisponibilidade dos serviços. Logo, esse estudo sugere que ANEEL adote a variável monetária como proxy para qualidade dos serviços prestados no segmento de transmissão elétrica brasileira. Assim, como proxy para a realidade brasileira, sugere-se a adoção da Parcela Variável – PV, parcela referente a indisponibilidade do sistema, a qual como punição, é descontada anualmente da Receita Anual Permitida – RAP.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 006/2006 – SRE/ANEEL
ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 064/2006 – SRE/ANEEL
ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 068/2006 – SRE/ANEEL
ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 182/2007 – SRE/ANEEL
ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 274/2009 – SRE/ANEEL
ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 048/2010 – SRE/ANEEL
ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 021/2011 – SRE/ANEEL
ANEEL Nota Técnica nº 383/2012 – SRE/ANEEL
AGRELL, P J; BOGETOFT, P. Regulatory benchmarking: Models, analyses and applications. DEA J (forthcoming), 2016.
AIGNER, Dennis; LOVELL, C A Knox; SCHMIDT, Peter. Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. journal of Econometrics, v. 6, n. 1, p. 21–37, 1977.
AJODHIA, Virendra; HAKVOORT, Rudi. Economic regulation of quality in electricity distribution networks. Utilities Policy, v. 13, n. 3, p. 211–221, 2005.
AJODHIA, Virendra; PETROV, Konstantin; SCARSI, Gian Carlo. Economic benchmarking and its applications, 2004.
ALTOÉ, Andrey Vinícius et al. Technical efficiency and financial performance in the Brazilian distribution service operators. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2017.
AROCENA, Pablo. Cost and quality gains from diversification and vertical integration in the electricity industry: A DEA approach. Energy economics, v. 30, n. 1, p. 39–58, 2008.
AZADEH, Ali; MOVAGHAR, Somayeh Ahmadi. An integrated multivariate approach for performance assessment and optimisation of electricity transmission systems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, v. 5, n. 2, p. 226–248, 2010.
BANKER, Rajiv D; CHARNES, Abraham; COOPER, William Wager. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management science, v. 30, n. 9, p. 1078–1092, 1984.
BANKER, Rajiv D; MOREY, Richard C. Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Operations research, v. 34, n. 4, p. 513–521, 1986.
BARNUM, Darold T; GLEASON, John M. Bias and precision in the DEA two-stage method. Applied Economics, v. 40, n. 18, p. 2305–2311, 2008.
BARNUM, Darold T; GLEASON, John M; HEMILY, Brendon. Using panel data analysis to estimate DEA confidence intervals adjusted for the environment. Journal of Transportation Engineering, v. 134, n. 5, p. 215–223, 2008.
BEESLEY, Michael E; LITTLECHILD, Stephen C. The regulation of privatized monopolies in the United Kingdom. The RAND Journal of Economics, p. 454–472, 1989.
BERNARDO, Natália. Evolução da Gestão da Qualidade de Serviço de Energia Elétrica no Brasil. . [S.l.]: Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. , 2013
BOGETOFT, Peter; OTTO, Lars. Benchmarking with DEA, SFA, and R. New York, NY: Springer New York, 2012. v. 157. Disponível em: . (International Series in Operations Research & Management Science).
CADENA, Angela et al. Efficiency analysis in electricity transmission utilities. Journal of Industrial and Management Optimization, v. 5, n. 2, p. 253–274, 2009.
CAMBINI, Carlo; CROCE, Annalisa; FUMAGALLI, Elena. Output-based incentive regulation in electricity distribution: Evidence from Italy. Energy Economics, v. 45, p. 205–216, 2014.
CHARNES, Abraham; COOPER, William W; RHODES, Edwardo. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European journal of operational research, v. 2, n. 6, p. 429–444, 1978.
CHASE, Richard B; HAYES, Robert H. Beefing up operations in service firms. Sloan Management Review, v. 33, n. 1, p. 15, 1991.
COELLI, Tim et al. Incorporating quality of service in a benchmarking model: An application to French electricity distribution operators. available at: h ttp://www. gis-larsen. org/Pdf/Plagnet. pdf, June, 2008.
COELLI, Tim J et al. Estimating the cost of improving quality in electricity distribution: A parametric distance function approach. Energy Policy, v. 53, p. 287–297, 2013.
COELLI, Timothy J et al. An introduction to efficiency and productivity analysis. Springer Science & Business Media, 2005.
CYRILLO, Ivo Ordonha. Estabelecimento de metas de qualidade na distribuição de energia elétrica por otimização da rede e do nível tarifário. Universidade de São Paulo. , 2011
DE ANDRADE, Gustavo Naciff; SANTANNA, Annibal Parracho. Análise da evolução da eficiência de empresas de transmissão de energia elétrica. 2011.
DE QUEIROZ, Leonardo Mendonça Oliveira. Assessing the Overall Performance of Brazilian Electric Distribution Companies. George Washington University, Washington DC, 2012.
EMROUZNEJAD, Ali; PARKER, Barnett R; TAVARES, Gabriel. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA. Socio-economic planning sciences, v. 42, n. 3, p. 151–157, 2008.
FØRSUND, Finn R. COMMENTS ON ANEEL’S MODELS. Benchmarking using Data Envelopment Analysis-DEA in Regulating Electricity, p. 77, 2015.
GABSZEWICZ, Jean J; WAUTHY, Xavier Y. Quality underprovision by a monopolist when quality is not costly. Economics Letters, v. 77, n. 1, p. 65–72, 2002.
GIANNAKIS, Dimitrios; JAMASB, Tooraj; POLLITT, Michael. Benchmarking and incentive regulation of quality of service: an application to the UK electricity distribution networks. Energy Policy, v. 33, n. 17, p. 2256–2271, 2005.
GRÖNROOS, Christian. Service management and marketing: Managing the moments of truth in service competition. [S.l.]: Jossey-Bass, 1990.
GRÖNROOS, Christian; MARQUES, Arlete Simille. Marketing: gerenciamento e serviços. [S.l.]: Elsevier/Campus, 2004.
GRÖNROOS, Christian; OJASALO, Katri. Service productivity: Towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services. Journal of Business Research, v. 57, n. 4, p. 414–423, 2004.
GROSSKOPF, Shawna. Statistical inference and nonparametric efficiency: A selective survey. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 7, n. 2, p. 161–176, 1996.
GROWITSCH, Christian et al. Social cost-efficient service quality—Integrating customer valuation in incentive regulation: Evidence from the case of Norway. Energy Policy, v. 38, n. 5, p. 2536–2544, 2010.
GROWITSCH, Christian; JAMASB, Tooraj; POLLITT, Michael. Quality of service, efficiency and scale in network industries: an analysis of European electricity distribution. Applied Economics, v. 41, n. 20, p. 2555–2570, 2009.
GROWITSCH, Christian; JAMASB, Tooraj; WETZEL, Heike. Efficiency effects of observed and unobserved heterogeneity: Evidence from Norwegian electricity distribution networks. Energy Economics, v. 34, n. 2, p. 542–548, 2012.
GROWITSCH, Christian; JAMASB, Tooraj; WETZEL, Heike. Efficiency effects of quality of service and environmental factors: experience from Norwegian electricity distribution. . [S.l.]: EWI Working Paper, 2010.
HANEY, Aoife Brophy; POLLITT, Michael G. Efficiency analysis of energy networks: An international survey of regulators. Energy policy, v. 37, n. 12, p. 5814–5830, 2009.
HANEY, Aoife Brophy; POLLITT, Michael G. International benchmarking of electricity transmission by regulators: A contrast between theory and practice? Energy Policy, v. 62, p. 267–281, 2013.
HEGGSET, J et al. Quality of supply in the deregulated Norwegian power system. 2001, IEEE, 2001. p. 6–.
JAMASB, Tooraj; OREA, Luis; POLLITT, Michael. Estimating the marginal cost of quality improvements: The case of the UK electricity distribution companies. Energy Economics, v. 34, n. 5, p. 1498–1506, 2012.
JAMASB, Tooraj; POLLITT, Michael. Benchmarking and regulation: international electricity experience. Utilities policy, v. 9, n. 3, p. 107–130, 2000.
JAMASB, Tooraj; POLLITT, Michael. Benchmarking and regulation of electricity transmission and distribution utilities: Lessons from international experience. Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, 2001.
JAMASB, Tooraj; POLLITT, Michael. Incentive regulation of electricity distribution networks: Lessons of experience from Britain. Energy Policy, v. 35, n. 12, p. 6163–6187, 2007.
JOSKOW, Paul L. Incentive regulation in theory and practice: electricity distribution and transmission networks. Economic Regulation and Its Reform: What Have We Learned? University of Chicago Press, 2014. p. 291–344.
KLOP, Manuel. Charting the Gaps: EU regulation of gas transmission tariffs in the Netherlands and the UK. Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, 2009.
KNEIP, Alois; SIMAR, Léopold. A general framework for frontier estimation with panel data. Journal of Productivity Analysis, v. 7, n. 2, p. 187–212, 1996.
KORHONEN, Pekka J; SYRJÄNEN, Mikko J. Evaluation of cost efficiency in Finnish electricity distribution. Annals of Operations Research, v. 121, n. 1–4, p. 105–122, 2003.
LAMPE, Hannes W; HILGERS, Dennis. Trajectories of efficiency measurement: A bibliometric analysis of DEA and SFA. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 240, n. 1, p. 1–21, 2015.
LANGSET, T et al. Quality dependent revenue caps-a model for quality of supply regulation. 2001, [S.l.]: IET, 2001. p. 5.
LANGSET; TORE. Quality dependent revenues—incentive regulation of quality of supply. Energy & Environment, v. 13, n. 4, p. 749–761, 2002.
LLORCA, Manuel; OREA, Luis; POLLITT, Michael G. Efficiency and environmental factors in the US electricity transmission industry. Energy Economics, v. 55, p. 234–246, 2016.
LOPES, Ana Lúcia Miranda; LANZER, Edgar A. DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS IN REGULATION OF DISTRIBUTION ENERGY COMPANIES. Benchmarking using Data Envelopment Analysis-DEA in Regulating Electricity, p. 11, 2015.
LOVELOCK, Christopher. Services Marketing, 7/e. [S.l.]: Pearson Education India, 2011.
MEEUSEN, Wim; VAN DEN BROECK, Julien. Efficiency estimation from Cobb-Douglas production functions with composed error. International economic review, p. 435–444, 1977.
MIGUÉIS, Vera L et al. Productivity change and innovation in Norwegian electricity distribution companies. Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 63, n. 7, p. 982–990, 2012.
PESSANHA, José Francisco Moreira et al. Avaliação dos custos operacionais eficientes das empresas de transmissão do setor elétrico Brasileiro: uma proposta de adaptação do modelo dea adotado pela ANEEL. Pesquisa Operacional, v. 30, n. 3, p. 521–545, 2010.
RAMOS-REAL, Francisco Javier et al. The evolution and main determinants of productivity in Brazilian electricity distribution 1998–2005: An empirical analysis. Energy Economics, v. 31, n. 2, p. 298–305, 2009.
RESENDE, Marcelo. Relative efficiency measurement and prospects for yardstick competition in Brazilian electricity distribution. Energy Policy, v. 30, n. 8, p. 637–647, 2002.
ROBERT, A. Quality issues for system operators with special reference to European regulators. 2001, [S.l: s.n.], 2001.
SEIFORD, Lawrence M. Data envelopment analysis: the evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995). Journal of productivity analysis, v. 7, n. 2–3, p. 99–137, 1996.
SERRATO, Eduardo. Fronteiras paramétricas de eficiência para o segmento de transmissão de energia elétrica no Brasil. 2009. Universidade Federal de Brasilia, 2009. Disponível em: .
SILVA, Deisi Mara Ribeiro. What affects the efficiency of the operating costs of electrical energy distributors in BRAZIL?: an analysis using stochastic frontier. 2015.
SPENCE, A Michael. Monopoly, quality, and regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics, p. 417–429, 1975.
SPILLER, Pablo T; MARTORELL, Luis Viana. How should it be done? Electricity regulation in Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Chile. International comparisons of electricity regulation, p. 82–125, 1996.
STEINER, Faye. Regulation, industry structure, and performance in the electricity supply industry. 2000.
TANURE, J E Pd S; TAHAN, Carlos Marcio Vieira; LIMA, J W Marangon. Establishing quality performance of distribution companies based on yardstick regulation. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, v. 21, n. 3, p. 1148–1153, 2006.
TER-MARTIROSYAN, Anna; KWOKA, John. Incentive regulation, service quality, and standards in US electricity distribution. Journal of Regulatory Economics, v. 38, n. 3, p. 258–273, 2010.
THANASSOULIS, Emmanuel. Comparative performance measurement in regulation: the case of English and Welsh sewerage services. Journal of the Operational Research Society, v. 53, n. 3, p. 292–302, 2002.
THANASSOULIS, Emmanuel. DEA and its use in the regulation of water companies. European Journal of Operational Research, v. 127, n. 1, p. 1–13, 2000.
VOGELSANG, Ingo. Electricity transmission pricing and performance-based regulation. The Energy Journal, p. 97–126, 2006.
VOSS, Chris; TSIKRIKTSIS, Nikos; FROHLICH, Mark. Case research in operations management. International journal of operations & production management, v. 22, n. 2, p. 195–219, 2002.
XAVIER, S S et al. How Efficient are the Brazilian Electricity Distribution Companies? Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, v. 26, n. 3, p. 283–296, 2015.
YIN, Robert. Case study research: Design and methods . Beverly Hills. Sage publishing. 1994.
YU, William; JAMASB, Tooraj; POLLITT, Michael. Does weather explain cost and quality performance? An analysis of UK electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy, v. 37, n. 11, p. 4177–4188, 2009a.
YU, William; JAMASB, Tooraj; POLLITT, Michael. Willingness-to-pay for quality of service: an application to efficiency analysis of the UK electricity distribution utilities. The Energy Journal, p. 1–48, 2009b.
Publicado
2018-12-21
Como Citar
Santos, R. A. (2018). EVOLUÇÃO DA PROXY QUALIDADE PARA MODELOS DE EFICIÊNCIA BASEADOS EM BENCHMARKING. Revista Vianna Sapiens, 9(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.31994/rvs.v9i2.413