Decision making from a cognitive perspective: analysis of research strategies used in studies between 2009 and 2019

análise das estratégias de pesquisa utilizadas em estudos entre 2009 e 2019

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31994/rvs.v12i1.716

Keywords:

Behavioral decision making. Cognition. Bibliometric analysis. Methodological strategies.

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the research strategies used in studies on behavioral decision making and cognition. For this purpose, a bibliometric study was carried out with 2,001 articles, made available on the research platform Web of Science, in the period from 2009 to 2019, when searching for the terms Behavioral decision making or Cognition in the Business and Management categories. From the detected studies, we chose to evaluate in detail the 13 studies that were associated with the themes of behavioral decision making and cognition, as well as being included in the parameters of the h-index obtained. The results allowed to present a broad view of academic production on the subject, as well as the research strategies used. In general, studies on decision and cognition are of a qualitative nature, of a descriptive type, with theoretical design, the source of evidence being the documentary analysis and do not present specific analysis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Eliete dos Reis Lehnhart, Federal University of Santa Maria - UFSM

PhD in Administration, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Postgraduate Program in Administration (PPGA). Department of Administrative Sciences.

Rafaela Dutra Tagliapietra, Federal University of Santa Maria - UFSM

Master in Business Administration, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Graduate Program in Business Administration (PPGA).

Julia Tontini, Federal University of Santa Maria - UFSM

Master's student in Administration, Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM), Postgraduate Program in Administration (PPGA).

References

BAZERMAN, M. H. Processo decisório: para cursos de administração e economia. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2004.

BENDER, C. S. O processamento da informação online e a decisão de compra em social commerce. 2019. 217f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração) – UFSM, Santa Maria, 2019.

CAPES – PORTAL DE PERIÓDICOS. Web of Science: coleção principal. 2000. Disponível em: <https://www.periodicos.capes.gov.br/?option=com_pcollection&mn=70&smn=79&cid=81>. Acesso em: 02 de fev. 2020.

GOMES, L. F. A. M. Teoria da Decisão. São Paulo: Thomson Learning, 2007.

KAHNEMAN, D. Rápido e devagar: duas formas de pensar. Objetiva, 2012.

LEHNHART, E. R. Tomada de decisão em contextos específicos: uma análise das relações entre os métodos multicritérios de apoio à decisão e as estratégias de decisão humana. 2016. 267f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) – UFSM. Santa Maria, 2016.

LÖBLER, M. L. Processamento da informação: uma avaliação dos diferentes níveis de conhecimento no processo de decisão. 2005. 215 f. Tese (Doutorado em Administração) – Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, 2005.

_____________; et al. Inventário de estilos de tomada de decisão: validação de instrumento no contexto brasileiro. Revista de Administração da UNIMEP, v. 17, n. 1, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15600/rau.v17i1.1167

MELLERS, B. A.; SCHWARTZ, A.; COOKE, A. D. J. Judgment and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, v. 49, n. 1, p. 447–77, 1998. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.447

MINTZBERG, H., RAISINGHANI, D., THEORET, A. The Structure of "Unstructured" Decision Processes. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 21, n. 2, p. 246-275, 1976. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2392045

PAYNE, J.W. Contingent decision behavior. Psychological bulletin, v. 92, n. 2, p. 382, 1982. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.92.2.382

___________; BETTMAN, J. R. Walking with the scarecrow: The information-processing approach to decision research. In: KOEHLER, D. J.; HARVEY, N. Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making, p. 110-132, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470752937.ch6

PEREIRA, B. A. D.; LÖBLER, M. L.; SIMONETTO, E. O. Análise dos modelos de tomada de decisão sob o enfoque cognitivo. Revista de Administração da UFSM, Santa Maria, v. 3, n. 2, p. 260-268, 2010. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/2734/273420396008.pdf

SAATY, T. L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, v. 1, n. 1, p. 83-98, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSci.2008.01759

SIMON, H. A. The new science of management decision. New York: Harper and Row, 1960.

___________. A behavioral model of rational choice. The quarterly journal of economics, v. 69, n. 1, p. 99-118, 1955. https://doi.org/10.2307/1884852

SPIEGEL, T. An overview of cognition roles in decision-making. In: WANG, J. Encyclopedia of Business Analytics and Optimization. 1 ed. United States: IGI Global, p. 74-84, 2014.

STERNBERG, R. J. Psicologia Cognitiva. Porto Alegre: Artes Médicas Sul, 2000.

TAGLIAPIETRA, R. D. Investigando a influência das recomendações de produtos online no processo de decisão de compra sob a perspectiva Neuro-IS. 2018. 185f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Administração) – UFSM. Santa Maria, 2018.

THANUSKODI, S. Journal of Social Sciences: A Bibliometric Study, Journal of Social Sciences, v. 24, n. 2, p. 77-80, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2010.11892847

TVERSKY, A.; KAHNEMAN, D. Judgment under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science, v. 185, n. 4157, p. 1124-1131, 1974. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

WEB OF SCIENCE. h-index. 2020. Disponível em: <https://www.webofknowledge.com/>. Acesso em: 01 set. 2020.

Published

2021-02-23

How to Cite

dos Reis Lehnhart, E., Dutra Tagliapietra, R., & Tontini, J. (2021). Decision making from a cognitive perspective: analysis of research strategies used in studies between 2009 and 2019: análise das estratégias de pesquisa utilizadas em estudos entre 2009 e 2019. Revista Vianna Sapiens, 12(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.31994/rvs.v12i1.716